Credo.Check.Readability.PredicateFunctionNames
This check was recently improved in Credo and it does make sense for readability. The offending functions in Pleroma have been renamed and a couple missing the ? suffix have been fixed as well.
This commit is contained in:
parent
18d38486a5
commit
5b95abaeea
35 changed files with 150 additions and 150 deletions
|
|
@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.CommonAPI do
|
|||
do: visibility in ~w(public unlisted)
|
||||
|
||||
def public_announce?(object, _) do
|
||||
Visibility.is_public?(object)
|
||||
Visibility.public?(object)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def get_visibility(_, _, %Participation{}), do: {"direct", "direct"}
|
||||
|
|
@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.CommonAPI do
|
|||
end
|
||||
|
||||
defp activity_is_public(activity) do
|
||||
with false <- Visibility.is_public?(activity) do
|
||||
with false <- Visibility.public?(activity) do
|
||||
{:error, :visibility_error}
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue