Credo.Check.Readability.PredicateFunctionNames
This check was recently improved in Credo and it does make sense for readability. The offending functions in Pleroma have been renamed and a couple missing the ? suffix have been fixed as well.
This commit is contained in:
parent
18d38486a5
commit
5b95abaeea
35 changed files with 150 additions and 150 deletions
|
|
@ -2404,9 +2404,9 @@ defmodule Pleroma.User do
|
|||
|
||||
defp put_password_hash(changeset), do: changeset
|
||||
|
||||
def is_internal_user?(%User{nickname: nil}), do: true
|
||||
def is_internal_user?(%User{local: true, nickname: "internal." <> _}), do: true
|
||||
def is_internal_user?(_), do: false
|
||||
def internal?(%User{nickname: nil}), do: true
|
||||
def internal?(%User{local: true, nickname: "internal." <> _}), do: true
|
||||
def internal?(_), do: false
|
||||
|
||||
# A hack because user delete activities have a fake id for whatever reason
|
||||
# TODO: Get rid of this
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue